7 Key Factors to Consider When Choosing Chemistry Analyzers

Choosing a suitable chemistry analyzer is critical for laboratories and research facilities. The selection process requires careful consideration of various factors to ensure optimal performance, reliability, and efficiency. In this post, let’s explore seven key factors when choosing chemistry analyzers.

Testing Throughput and Workload

One of the foremost factors to consider is the chemistry analyzer’s testing throughput and workload capacity.

Laboratories vary in size and demand, and a misalliance between the analyzer’s capacity and the laboratory’s workload can lead to inefficiencies.
Active consideration of the volume of tests the analyzer can handle per hour, and its overall capacity ensures that the chosen instrument aligns with the laboratory’s specific needs.

For example, the Indiko Plus is fully automated, with an onboard capacity of 108 sample positions & 42 reagent positions. Visit the supplier’s Jant Pharmacal website to learn about its detailed specifications.

Test Menu and Flexibility

The diversity of tests that a chemistry analyzer can perform is crucial.

A comprehensive test menu with various assays for different parameters enhances the instrument’s versatility.
Laboratories should actively assess the flexibility of the analyzer in accommodating new tests or adapting to changes in testing requirements.

This factor is significant in dynamic research and healthcare environments where testing needs may evolve.

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and precision are paramount in laboratory testing. The chosen chemistry analyzer should consistently produce reliable and reproducible results.

Active consideration of the instrument’s analytical performance, including its coefficient of variation and accuracy across a spectrum of analytes, is crucial.
Quality control measures and calibration protocols should be evaluated actively to ensure that the analyzer meets the required standards for precision and accuracy.

Automation and Workflow Integration

The automation level and the integration of the chemistry analyzer into existing workflows greatly influence laboratory operations efficiency.

Active consideration of the instrument’s automation capabilities, including sample handling, assay preparation, and result reporting, helps streamline processes and reduces the risk of human error.
Compatibility with laboratory information systems (LIS) and other automation solutions enhances workflow integration, promoting a seamless and efficient testing environment.

Maintenance and Downtime

Look for instruments with features such as –

Self-diagnosis
Predictive maintenance alerts
Modular components for easy replacement

It contributes towards reduced downtime.

Cost of Ownership

Laboratories should actively consider the total cost of ownership, taking into account not only the initial purchase cost but also ongoing expenses such as –

Consumables
Maintenance
Training

A comprehensive cost analysis provides a clearer picture of the long-term investment associated with a particular analyzer, supporting informed decision-making.

Regulatory Compliance and Accreditation

Compliance with regulatory standards and accreditation requirements is non-negotiable in laboratory settings.

Chemistry analyzers must adhere to industry and regulatory standards to ensure the validity and reliability of test results.
Laboratories should actively assess whether the chosen analyzer meets the necessary certifications and is compatible with accreditation requirements.

Active engagement with regulatory bodies and adherence to best practices contribute to the credibility and reputation of the laboratory.

Conclusion

Testing throughput, flexibility, accuracy, automation, maintenance, cost of ownership, and regulatory compliance are all critical elements that contribute to the overall performance and suitability of the chosen instrument.

By actively evaluating these factors, laboratories can make informed decisions that align with their specific needs, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and reliability of their testing processes.